清华大学核科学与技术硕士学位论文评分参考标准——李依晴ScoringCriteria for Master's Degree Thesis in Nuclear Science and Technology at Tsinghua University_Yiqing Li_问卷系统

扫码填写或分享

登录后保存答题记录立即登录

清华大学核科学与技术硕士学位论文评分参考标准——李依晴

Scoring Criteria for Master's Degree Thesis in Nuclear Science and Technology at Tsinghua University_Yiqing Li

学位论文题目（Thesis title）: 基于LAPUTA的组件等效参数产

生方法研究和程序开发（Research and Program Development of Assembly Equivalent Parameter Generation Method Based on LAPUTA）

学号（Student ID Number）：2023213718

作者（Author）: 李依晴（Yiqing Li）

日期（Date）: 2026.5.12

论文选题（Thesis Topic Selection）

A（优）：接触学科前沿，对国民经济、科学技术、社会实践有较大的实用价值或理论意义

A (Excellent): Closely related to frontier research and of clear theoretical significance and practical value to the national economy, science and technology, or social practice

B（良）：对国民经济、科学技术或社会实践有价值或理论意义

B (Good): Of theoretical significance or practical value to the national economy, science and technology, or social practice

C（合格）：对国民经济有应用背景，或在社会实践、科学技术上有一定的理论意义

C (Satisfactory): Relevant to the national economy or practical/social applications, with certain theoretical significance

D（不合格）：选题不当，理论意义或实用价值不明确

D (Unsatisfactory): Inappropriate topic selection; unclear theoretical significance or practical value

论文成果与新见解（Research Outcomes and Originality）

A（优）：有独到的新见解，立论正确，成果突出

A (Excellent): Novel findings, rigorous argumentation, and outstanding research outcomes

B（良）：立论基本正确，成果较好，有新见解

B (Good): Basically correct conclusions, good research outcomes, and some originality

C（合格）：有一定的新见解，成果有一定意义

C (Satisfactory): Some originality, with research outcomes of certain value

D（不合格）：概念模糊，没有取得有意义的成果

D (Unsatisfactory): Vague concepts and no meaningful research outcomes

理论分析实践环节（包括社会调查、实验手段等）及工作量（Theoretical Foundation and Practical Competence, including literature review, data collection and analysis, etc. and Workload）

A（优）：既有理论分析，又经严格的实践验证或鉴定，成果可靠，独立工作能力强，工作量大

A (Excellent): Practical Competence (including literature review, data collection and analysis, etc.) and Workload

Solid theoretical foundation and rigorous practical/experimental verification; reliable outcomes; strong independent research capability; substantial workload

B（良）：有理论分析也有实验验证，独立工作能力较强，工作量适中

B (Good): Adequate theoretical analysis and experimental verification; relatively strong independent working ability; appropriate workload

C（合格）：有必要的理论分析和实践环节，有一定的独立工作能力，工作量基本合乎要求

C (Satisfactory): Necessary theoretical analysis and practical verification; certain independent working ability; workload generally meets requirements

D（不合格）：基础知识不坚实或实验验证不够，或独立工作能力差，工作量不够

D (Unsatisfactory): Weak theoretical foundation or insufficient experimental verification; poor independent working ability; inadequate workload

论文写作及科学作风（Thesis Writing and Academic Style）

A（优）：概念清晰，层次分明，善于总结提高。文字图表规范，学风严谨

A (Excellent): Clear concepts, well-organized structure, strong summarization ability, complete documentation, and rigorous academic writing

B（良）：条理性好、层次清楚、总结提高好，文字、图表基本符合规范。

B (Good): Good logical organization, clear structure, good synthesis and improvement. Text and figures/tables largely conform to standards

C（合格）：总结提高尚可，有条理性，基本符合规范。

C (Satisfactory): Acceptable synthesis and improvement, with logical organization; basically conforms to standards

D（不合格）：不善于总结提高，写作能力差。

D (Unsatisfactory): Poor at synthesis and improvement; weak writing ability

答辩情况（Oral Defense Performance）

A（优）：报告重点突出，阐述清楚，能较高水平地回答问题。

A (Excellent): Clear and focused presentation; able to answer questions at a high level

B（良）：阐述清楚，能正确地回答与本文有关的主要问题。

B (Good): Clear presentation; able to correctly answer the main questions related to the thesis

C（合格）：报告条理基本清楚，回答问题基本正确。

C (Satisfactory): Basically clear presentation; answers are basically correct

D（不合格）：报告条理不清，回答问题有重要错误或不懂装懂。

D (Unsatisfactory): Disorganized presentation; major errors in answering questions, or pretending to understand when not

总成绩（Overall Performance）

A（优）

A (Excellent)

B（良）

B(Good)

C（合格）

C (Satisfactory)

D（不合格）

D (Unsatisfactory)

隐私政策

龙艺秀提供技术支持